To the end of 2007 the PS and UMP should

With its "professional social security," the CGT did fly. Sustainably. This in fact of long months that political parties have identified this concept intended to meet the "social insecurity" diagnosed as soon as the previous presidential campaign. And far be bored, they seem to not be able to do without, as well to the right to the left. Because according to them, it means the transformation of more and more fragmented labor, where the life Commission clears for the benefit of a succession of contracts, courses, training, more or less long term. To the end of 2007, the PS and UMP should... use it to say things, but at the risk, for at the outset, to obscure the debate.

In his last speech, in Agen, "for the France of the work" ("Les Echos" on 23-24 June), Nicolas Sarkozy is used to show that in more Exchange flexibility on the labour market it is ready to give more guarantees for laid-off employees. "To the business leader who is reluctant to hire because he is afraid of not being able to dismiss (...)". I propose a single indeterminate, more flexible-term contract. An employee who has fear of insecurity, I propose to create a professional social security to secure the whole of his career not only his use of the time.

"Nothing to do with assistance."

That is what it covers Adviser responsible for UMP of employment, Marc - Philippe Daubresse precise: in line with the experience of contract of professional transition by the Minister of employment and social cohesion, Jean-Louis Borloo, "economic licensees would be accompanied by a referee, the State would take in charge their training, they would be encouraged to accept internships or some odd jobs. "These conditions, they could receive part of their previous wages for a limited time". While acknowledging that the formula chosen by the Minister of the Interior is not necessarily the most adapted, he believes that "in any case, this has nothing to do with that proposes the PS, which is of the order of assistance".

"Sharing risks".

The Socialists are, them also, in the trial and error. Key distinctions: they bind less directly the device to the question of termination of employment, including in seeking to secure the route of the young people upon their entry into working life (with the "autonomy allowance"). In its draft, the PS refers to the need to build a security professional, called, "with the social partners" shortly, "universal professional coverage": it "will be the three major elements of the work: employment, a guarantee of resources and professional promotion.". In this framework, we will create an individual right to training throughout life even more higher that the initial training was short. "It will take the form of a"professional vital card"". After the crisis of the CPE, it is less likely, left, to discuss this in exchange for potential flexibilities of the employment contract. But the question that get angry, the financing of this mechanism, is not addressed. In a recent interview with the "world", Ségolène Royal pointed to the need to "pool risks among employees and companies", a term claimed by Marc-Philippe Daubresse, that "everything is cursor issue."